John Green's tumblr

  • Business
  • Art
  • My new book
  • The TFiOS film
  • Funny GIFs
  • Sports
  • Wall of text
  • Archive
  • RSS
  • You can ask me questions only if you agree not to get mad if I don't answer.
banner

Follow-up to Yesterday’s Post about The Fault in Our Stars

Yesterday I posted about why I think The Fault in Our Stars has sold so well, and there were hundreds of very interesting responses. Among them:

1. Valerie2776 pointed out that the mechanics of sharing online changed tremendously between 2008 and 2012, which meant that TFiOS’ first readers (fans of my previous books and/or nerdfighters, mostly) could respond to the book in a public way (on tumblr and twitter especially) that just didn’t exist in the same way in 2008 when Paper Towns came out.

This also reminded me that both Paper Towns and WGWG had under 5,000 preorders, whereas TFiOS had something like 65,000 (primarily because I signed all the preorders*) so the initial activation energy was much larger. So there were both more people talking about the book and more places online to be heard talking about the book.

2. Jutze (who wrote the brilliant 52-second song The Fault in the Fault in Our Stars) pointed out that in fact there was in fact a statistically significant decline in goodreads ratings in the past six months, although a relatively small one.

Publishers take note: You should hire this guy to do quant analysis. Anyway, if you’re wondering why Amazon bought goodreads….this is why.

3. Many people argued the The Fault in Our Stars is just BETTER than my other books. I think this is probably true, and certainly the data agrees: The overall goodreads ratings:

The Fault in Our Stars - 4.52 - 234,000 ratings
Looking for Alaska - 
4.26 - 152,000 ratings
Paper Towns - 
4.13 - 84,000 ratings
Katherines - 3.87 - 60,000 ratings

How strong is the correlation between number of readers (as represented by number of ratings) and overall rating? I don’t know. You’ll have to ask Jutze. But there certainly is a correlation (and consistently, every week, TFiOS sells better than Alaska which sells better than Paper Towns which sells better than Katherines)**.

Publishers take note:After you hire someone to do quantitative analysis, you can find books on your backlist that are beloved but selling less than they should and then market them more aggressively.

4. Jemappellery points out, “I want to read this book again. I need to buy another copy, though, because my aunt’s dog threw up on mine.” This is also an important component of my sales strategy.

5. Genre. till-therewas-you points out that people like romantic tragedies, which has been true for quite some time. My previous books were less genre-conscious. Alaska is a boarding school novel, but that is a less well-established genre.

6. And lastly, toloveandlivejess points out “another factor is the thyca community.” (Thyroid cancer survivors.) So have many young people living with cancer and their families have supported the book. This has really surprised me, but I am grateful for it. It means a lot to me personally, but on a purely professional level, it speaks to the power that niche communities have today to make a book/movie/vlog/game successful. Whether it’s nerdfighteria or book clubs or the online network of thyroid cancer survivors, communities matter.

* Except those of you living in the UK/Germany. SORRY.

** Of course statistical analysis can’t reflect passion or enthusiasm or quantify the importance of a book to someone. People on average may like Katherines less than my other books, but the people who do like it often feel a deep connection to it, which is wonderful and I’m in no way trying to say that sales are the only (or even the best) measure of value. I’m just trying to put together some thoughts on what shapes sales.

    • #the fault in our stars
    • #tfios
    • #publishing
    • #books
    • #reading
    • #john green
    • #nerdfighters
    • #statistics
    • #wall of text
  • 2 weeks ago
  • 1558
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Why Has The Fault in Our Stars Been So Successful?

The Fault in Our Stars is my fourth (4.5th?) novel, and it has found a very wide readership. I often get questions asking what my secret is, or why the book has been successful, and then of course there are also lots of people out there speculating about the reasons for the book’s success.

So I thought I’d try to add what I can to the conversation. I’m interested in the question partly because I want to see more YA books find broad readerships and partly because I want to understand why this book has done so much better than my previous novels (although they are now, happily, riding on TFiOS’s coattails).

So:

1. The Fault in Our Stars is NOT successful primarily because I am famous on the Internet. I know this because I was famous on the Internet when Paper Towns was published, and also when Will Grayson, Will Grayson was published. (TFiOS has almost a million copies in print; Paper Towns sold perhaps 4% as much in its first year.) Having the built-in audience of nerdfighteria is tremendously important to me and to my work, but both Paper Towns and WGWG sold less in hardcover than Looking for Alaska, which was published when I was entirely unknown online. 

For many reasons—partly because I’d built a readership over the past six years, partly because I signed the entire first print run—TFiOS had far more preorders than my previous novels. But when you have the kind of regular relationship with your audience that I do, pretty much 100% of that built-in fan base buys your book within the first month.* It’s not something they find browsing at a bookstore three months later, as shown by the huge drop-off in sales for Paper Towns and WGWG. Why did this not happen with TFiOS? I think for a few reasons, which I’ll discuss below.

(Some people will say that I have a broader audience online now than I did in 2008 or 2010. True, but social media is generally much more crowded and fractured. Like, the video I made announcing the cover of Paper Towns got more views than the video I made announcing the cover of TFiOS, for instance.)

I do think the initial goodwill that nerdfighters showed the book—streaming onto amazon and goodreads to give the book positive reviews—probably helped the book begin to reach outside the community. But this also raises a critical point, which is that on average nerdfighters seem to like The Fault in Our Stars almost exactly as much as what I will call for lack of a better term “regular people.” We have pretty good data here thanks to goodreads, where more than 130,000 people have now rated The Fault in Our Stars. The average rating of the first 50,000 goodreads raters (who are more likely to be nerdfighters) is almost identical to the average rating of the most reading 50,000 goodreads raters (who are less likely to be nerdfighters). The same is true on amazon, where the book’s average rating has actually gone up a bit in the past six months (although not in a statistically significant way).

So while the enthusiasm of early readers, who tended to be nerdfighters, gave the book tremendous activation energy, it could’ve gone the way of Paper Towns and WGWG—books that did well and found wonderful readerships but almost immediately fell off bestseller lists. Instead, 72 weeks after publication, it’s still at #1.

2. The Fault in Our Stars has not been successful because I am male. I hear this a lot, and I just don’t think it’s true, except insofar as I have a bunch of privileges. (I am also cisgendered and heterosexual and grew up in the United States and write in English and graduated from college without debt and so on.) I think there is sexism in the critical discourse surrounding YA books and in many cases with how books are marketed. (The marketing problem is I think largely born from two incorrect beliefs still widely held in some corners of YA publishing: first, that young men do not purchase books and can never be convinced to, and second, that young women enjoy being condescended to.)

For one thing, I was also male when I wrote my other novels, none of which came close to the commercial or critical success of The Fault in Our Stars. Also, the other breakout non-series, realistic children’s titles of 2012 were Wonder and Out of My Mind, both written by women.

The truth is, no YA novel has ever been chosen as the best fiction book of the year by TIME Magazine**, or appeared on so many adult-oriented best-of-the-year lists (Entertainment Weekly, Wall Street Journal, USA Today, etc.). Did this happen because TFiOS is the best YA book ever? No. It means that someone got a bunch of adult literary critics to read a YA novel that those adult literary critics really liked. This someone is named Elyse Marshall. (More on her in a moment.)

The other oft-repeated line here is that The Fault in Our Stars got a cool, literary cover because I’m a guy, and if I’d been female it would’ve had a pink cover with a decpitated girl head. And it might have, if I’d been a female first novelist with someone other than Julie Strauss-Gabel as my editor. (More on her in a moment.)

SO WHY DO I THINK THE FAULT IN OUR STARS HAS BEEN SO EXTRAORDINARILY SUCCESSFUL?

1. People like it. This tends to be underappreciated, I think. As noted above, in the last few years we’ve gotten access to really rich data about readers’ tastes and opinions, which can be tremendously useful. With more than 233,000 ratings, TFiOS’s average rating of 4.52 is very high compared to comparable titles. (It’s worth noting that other breakout nonseries fiction titles—from Wonder to The Book Thief to Out of My Mind almost always have average ratings above 4.30, which is very high for goodreads.)

I don’t know why people like The Fault in Our Stars, but they do, and they seem to like it enough to recommend it to their friends and family.

2. I have the best editor in YA publishing and have been working with her for nine years. 

Obviously I’m biased, but I think Julie Strauss-Gabel is the best editor and publisher in young adult lit today. In the past 12 months, she has published New York Times bestsellers by Adam Gidwitz, Gayle Foreman, John Grisham, Ally Condie, and me. Her books are also critically acclaimed; in fact, I don’t know the last time she published a book that didn’t get any starred reviews. (2009, maybe?)

This is not because Julie has great taste; it is because she is a great editor who makes the books she works on far better than they would otherwise be. And because we’ve worked together for nine years, we have a great deal of trust in each other’s judgement. This is true when it comes to editorial decisions within the book; it’s also true when it comes to publishing decisions.

For instance, when I said, “Julie, I want to sign the whole first printing,” she didn’t say, “That will be expensive and very complicated” (although it was both). She said, “Yes.”

And when she said, “I think we should publish the book in January,” even though that defied all the conventional wisdom about when to publish a Big Book, I said yes.

And about that cover: Many people wanted TFiOS to have a broadly commercial YA-ish, girl-oriented cover. Julie really believed in something graphic and minimalist that would look different from other books on the YA shelf and would also lend itself to visual remixes and fan-driven creations. Although the brilliant sales and marketing team at Penguin were hesitant, they trusted Julie’s judgement. That’s why the cover exists.

3. My entire backlist is with the same publishing house.

This largely goes down to good luck, but since everything I’ve ever written was published by Dutton, it’s easier to work with bookstores and bookselling web sites to create displays and package deals and stuff. This sounds like a small matter, but in fact it has been critically important (and the biggest reason why the sales of TFiOS have lifted the sales of my other books so much). It has been much harder, for instance, for Scholastic, which published Markus Zusak’s brilliant I Am the Messenger to capitalize on the success of The Book Thief, which was published by Random House.

4. Elyse Marshall is my publicist. 

So I assume the reason TIME Magazine and USA Today and Entertainment Weekly chose The Fault in Our Stars as one of the best books of the year is because critics there did think very highly of the book. But Elyse is the reason they read it in the first place. If they don’t read it, they don’t review it. Thousands of books come out every year; as a reviewer, it’s very hard to figure out what to read and review, and it’s easy to dismiss YA novels, particularly if you are  Serious Real Book Reviewer. Elyse did an amazingly good job of convincing people to read TFiOS.

She also organized an improbably successful book tour by working with many of the best independent bookstores in the country. The tour sold more than 11,000 copies of The Fault in Our Stars and Elyse was able to do this while still adhering to my annoying restriction that we do the entire thing without flying.

5. Penguin just happens to the best right now. 

Power shifts quickly in publishing, but there’s little question that under the leadership of Don Weisberg, Felicia Frazier, and Jennifer Loja, Penguin has emerged as the most effective publishing house in YA. I also think Penguin has the best sales team, and it helps that I’ve known most of those people personally for eight years. Penguin has always been very good at facilitating relationships and collaborations between authors and employees. 

6. My readers are evangelists.

I don’t know why, but if you scroll through the Looking for Alaska or TFiOS tags on tumblr, you see a lot of people screaming at their friends to read my books, and making art about the books, and animating quotations from them, and so on. I am just really lucky in this respect. I do not understand this, and I wish I did, because I’d like to see it happen more often with more books. 

So that’s why I think The Fault in Our Stars has had such an extraordinary year, but I’m interested to know what you think.


* I can more or less prove this, because we tracked clickthroughs on affiliate links. We know exactly how many people clicked through to the TFiOS page on Amazon, indiebound, or B&N and ended up buying a book. Within two weeks of the book’s publication, the numbers dropped to literally single digits, which meant that almost none of the people who follow me on YouTube or twitter or tumblr were buying the book from my link. This continued until Hank and I just stopped linking to the book in mid-February.

** It’s worth noting that among TIME’s Top 10 was Catherynne Valente’s brilliant The Girl Who Fell Beneath Fairyland and Led the Revels There. To me this kind of stuff is just good news for children’s and YA publishing, no matter who it happens to, because it allows us to expand our reach both to adults and to teens who think they dislike YA books because they don’t yet realize the breadth of contemporary YA lit.

    • #tfios
    • #the fault in our stars
    • #publishing
    • #book sales
    • #reading
    • #writing
    • #john green
    • #wall of text
  • 2 weeks ago
  • 4950
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
Last night I finished reading Bridget Zinn’s excellent novel Poison.
Poison is silly and funny and features both a bad-ass heroine and some excellent kissing as well as first-rate pig and dog characters. I suppose Poison is a book for kids and teens, in the Harry Potter sense, but one is never too old to live inside another world for a while, and this book really did transport me.
Poison’s author, Bridget Zinn, died in 2011 of colon cancer. She was 32. It was a huge loss for kid lit—although I didn’t know how huge until I read this excellent first (and sadly last) novel. 
These days publishers depend a lot on authors to market their own work. You’ve gotta tweet and tumbl and facebook and pinterest and set up school visits and signings and attend festivals. Sadly, Bridget isn’t here to share her excellent book, but I hope it still finds the many readers it deserves. Check it out.
Pop-upView Separately

Last night I finished reading Bridget Zinn’s excellent novel Poison.

Poison is silly and funny and features both a bad-ass heroine and some excellent kissing as well as first-rate pig and dog characters. I suppose Poison is a book for kids and teens, in the Harry Potter sense, but one is never too old to live inside another world for a while, and this book really did transport me.

Poison’s author, Bridget Zinn, died in 2011 of colon cancer. She was 32. It was a huge loss for kid lit—although I didn’t know how huge until I read this excellent first (and sadly last) novel. 

These days publishers depend a lot on authors to market their own work. You’ve gotta tweet and tumbl and facebook and pinterest and set up school visits and signings and attend festivals. Sadly, Bridget isn’t here to share her excellent book, but I hope it still finds the many readers it deserves. Check it out.

    • #poison
    • #bridget zinn
    • #books
    • #reading
    • #good books
    • #YA
  • 2 months ago
  • 2952
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
A few days ago, I received an email from P. F. Kluge, my fiction writing professor from Kenyon College, saying, “Drop everything and read How to Get Filthy Rich in Rising Asia.” 
So I did, and what a book. Brilliant and ruthless. Don’t miss it.
Pop-upView Separately

A few days ago, I received an email from P. F. Kluge, my fiction writing professor from Kenyon College, saying, “Drop everything and read How to Get Filthy Rich in Rising Asia.” 

So I did, and what a book. Brilliant and ruthless. Don’t miss it.

    • #mohsin hamid
    • #how to get filthy rich in rising asia
    • #good books
    • #reading
  • 2 months ago
  • 3069
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
lightjinx:

Reading The Name of the Star outside on a beautiful day! :) It’s on my Kindle but I promise its NOS. First time reading, so I’m very excited to read on; I even got my boyfriend to participate a little! :D

READ THE NAME OF THE STAR.
It is wonderful and the follow up is coming soon.
Zoom Info
lightjinx:

Reading The Name of the Star outside on a beautiful day! :) It’s on my Kindle but I promise its NOS. First time reading, so I’m very excited to read on; I even got my boyfriend to participate a little! :D

READ THE NAME OF THE STAR.
It is wonderful and the follow up is coming soon.
Zoom Info
lightjinx:

Reading The Name of the Star outside on a beautiful day! :) It’s on my Kindle but I promise its NOS. First time reading, so I’m very excited to read on; I even got my boyfriend to participate a little! :D

READ THE NAME OF THE STAR.
It is wonderful and the follow up is coming soon.
Zoom Info

lightjinx:

Reading The Name of the Star outside on a beautiful day! :) It’s on my Kindle but I promise its NOS. First time reading, so I’m very excited to read on; I even got my boyfriend to participate a little! :D

READ THE NAME OF THE STAR.

It is wonderful and the follow up is coming soon.

(via maureenjohnsonbooks)

Source: lightjinx

    • #the name of the star
    • #maureen johnson
    • #reading
    • #books
  • 3 months ago > lightjinx
  • 527
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Crash Course Literature turns to the poetry of Emily Dickinson. 

    • #emily dickinson
    • #poetry
    • #reading
    • #literature
    • #lit
    • #school
    • #ap english
    • #education
    • #poems
    • #john green
    • #crash course
    • #crash course literature
    • #crashcourse
  • 4 months ago
  • 1496
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

thecrashcourse:

Language, Voice, and Holden Caulfield: The Catcher in the Rye Part 1

In which John Green examines JD Salinger’s novel The Catcher in the Rye. John pulls out the old school literary criticism by examining the text itself rather than paying attention to the biographical or historical context of the novel (that’s for next week). Listen, words matter. The Catcher in the Rye has managed to endure without a movie adaptation because a lot of its quality arises from the book’s language. Find out how Holden’s voice, his language, and his narrative technique combine to make the novel work. Also, Thought Bubble gives us a quick rundown of the plot, in which Ikea Monkey may or may not appear.

Let us now begin to discuss J. D. Salinger’s great novel.

    • #catcher in the rye
    • #the catcher in the rye
    • #salinger
    • #jd salinger
    • #english lit
    • #american literature
    • #ap lit
    • #ap english
    • #reading
    • #books
    • #j d salinger
    • #crashcourse
    • #crash course
  • 5 months ago > thecrashcourse
  • 2058
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Pew Study Discovers that People In High School and College Read

Not only that, but Americans under 30 are more likely to read a book by choice than Americans over 30.

Adults are sitting around fretting about the Internet generation. We ought to be worrying about ourselves.

    • #reading
    • #books
    • #the kids are all right
  • 7 months ago > pmautomat
  • 2435
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

sincerely-jessy:

John’s Open Letter to Students Returning to School

Summer is ending.

I argue that this is good news. 

    • #education
    • #school
    • #learning
    • #reading
    • #nerdfighters
    • #john green
  • 10 months ago > sincerely-jessy
  • 5627
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

On Having Figured Out the Twist

“Why, for example, do the great writers use anticipation instead of surprise? Because surprise is merely an instrument of the unusual, whereas anticipation of a consequence enlarges our understanding of what is happening. Look at a point of land over which the sun is certain to rise, Coleridge said. If the moon rises there, so what? The senses are startled, that’s all. But if we know the point where the sun will rise as it has always risen and as it will rise tomorrow and the next day too, well, well! At the beginning of “Hamlet” there can be no doubt that by the play’s end, the prince will buy it. Between start and finish, then, we may concentrate on what he says and who he is, matters made more intense by our knowing he is doomed. In every piece of work, at one juncture or another, a writer has the choice of doing something weird or something true. The lesser writer will haul up the moon.” -Roger Rosenblatt, How to Write Great

There seems to be a feeling among readers these days that if they see an event coming, the book is less than it might’ve been. I couldn’t disagree more.

I stand with Rosenblatt in celebrating anticipation over surprise. Even when reading mystery novels, the pleasure for me is never in the feeling of, oh I didn’t see THAT coming. The pleasure is living with another’s dread and pain and yearning and hope. All of that is a hell of a lot more fulfilling than being surprised by the killer’s identity.

This is the whole reason foreshadowing exists. Foreshadowing, at its best, is not a trick demonstrated to brag about what a fancy writer you can be. It’s about building anticipation, so that the reader can more fully empathize with the characters in the story: I want s/he to battle and hope against the inevitable while reading just as we all do while living. When it works, anticipation is far more fulfilling than surprise, because we are reminded that a sunrise is precisely as magnificent as it is inevitable.

    • #writing
    • #books
    • #reading
    • #plot twists
  • 10 months ago
  • 2365
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Your Favorite YA Novels Ever

NPR.org is running a poll about the best-ever young adult novels. You get to choose 10 titles from among a very impressive list. It’s fun and easy and you should do it.

And yes, my books are among the books you can vote for, but certainly don’t feel obligated. There are a lot of great books on that list, and when I voted, I didn’t vote for myself!

…is an example of something I could say if I were a better person. I did vote for myself.

    • #admitting embarrassing things on tumblr
    • #YA lit
    • #reading
    • #books
    • #polls
  • 10 months ago
  • 2779
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

New video about feeling more alive and “The Hearth and the Salamander,” Part I of Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, which we’re reading for the Nerdfighter Book Club.

    • #fahrenheit 451
    • #reading
    • #books
    • #literature
    • #yay
  • 11 months ago
  • 766
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
Kat Rosenfield’s debut novel AMELIA ANNE IS DEAD AND GONE, edited and published by the great Julie Strauss-Gabel, has been nearly universally praised by critics. A starred review in Publisher’s Weekly called it “exquisitely written;” Kirkus’s starred review called the book “utterly compelling.” 
It is all that and more, a lyrical and keenly observed novel that is also a true page-turner. Like, imagine if Sara Zarr and I had a really awesome baby.
I’ll admit to a bias toward books Julie publishes—she has good taste, but more importantly she’s a great editor. But AMELIA ANNE is just damn good, and I hope it finds the audience it deserves.
I believe there are still readers for top-class literary YA fiction. And I know a lot of those readers are here on tumblr, so check out AMELIA ANNE IS DEAD AND GONE at Amazon, Barnes and Noble, or from your local bookseller.
Zoom Info
Kat Rosenfield’s debut novel AMELIA ANNE IS DEAD AND GONE, edited and published by the great Julie Strauss-Gabel, has been nearly universally praised by critics. A starred review in Publisher’s Weekly called it “exquisitely written;” Kirkus’s starred review called the book “utterly compelling.” 
It is all that and more, a lyrical and keenly observed novel that is also a true page-turner. Like, imagine if Sara Zarr and I had a really awesome baby.
I’ll admit to a bias toward books Julie publishes—she has good taste, but more importantly she’s a great editor. But AMELIA ANNE is just damn good, and I hope it finds the audience it deserves.
I believe there are still readers for top-class literary YA fiction. And I know a lot of those readers are here on tumblr, so check out AMELIA ANNE IS DEAD AND GONE at Amazon, Barnes and Noble, or from your local bookseller.
Zoom Info

Kat Rosenfield’s debut novel AMELIA ANNE IS DEAD AND GONE, edited and published by the great Julie Strauss-Gabel, has been nearly universally praised by critics. A starred review in Publisher’s Weekly called it “exquisitely written;” Kirkus’s starred review called the book “utterly compelling.” 

It is all that and more, a lyrical and keenly observed novel that is also a true page-turner. Like, imagine if Sara Zarr and I had a really awesome baby.

I’ll admit to a bias toward books Julie publishes—she has good taste, but more importantly she’s a great editor. But AMELIA ANNE is just damn good, and I hope it finds the audience it deserves.

I believe there are still readers for top-class literary YA fiction. And I know a lot of those readers are here on tumblr, so check out AMELIA ANNE IS DEAD AND GONE at Amazon, Barnes and Noble, or from your local bookseller.

    • #books
    • #literature
    • #reading
    • #kat rosenfield
    • #amelia anne is dead and gone
  • 11 months ago > penguinteen
  • 938
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Julie Strauss-Gabel on Reading

My publisher, Julie Strauss-Gabel, has a tumblr but hasn’t quite figured out how to maximize the tumblr experience. However, she sent me this after reading my defense of critical reading and the kind of analysis that is done in literature classes. Read it:

I think at the heart of this matter is an inability for people to be comfortable with opening themselves up to enjoying and understanding their reactions to literature—and finding a way to discuss the humanity and experience and emotion they bring to it—without putting it in an intellectual scaffold that, as part of process, overlays intent and purpose from the author. We’re all of afraid of allowing our response to good literature to be emotion, and then needing to figure out ourselves as part that response (even though that’s the whole point, isn’t it?).

 To some extent, literary analysis gives us a framework to discuss literature together, to momentarily put aside the importance of our varied personal experiences and find some sort of common language that allows us to share the experience, because as personal as reading a good book is, there’s also an intense need to discuss those books. To whittle it down to symbolism and intent and analysis that implies some sort of singular valid method/response is partly a safe playground for starting that conversation. It kickstarts one’s ability to understand that there is more to his/her own personal response than enjoyment and plot. But we all take it too far when it becomes the conversation itself, allowing us to avoid understanding what we bring to a book and, more importantly, what’s essentially human and emotional about good literature. It also denies the same human experience that an author brings to the process.

Sadly, it also misdirects the dialogue about the way creativity works, how great authors create, and tells aspiring writers from early on that there are right and wrong ways to build narrative and tell stories, putting handcuffs on what can be considered “literature” by boxing in what is usually an indefinable and initiate and personal and creative process for that writer, sometimes keeping people from allowing themselves the sophistication and freedom and core of personal engagement that would actually make that expression of self—an expression of self that has great value to others—truly great.

I’m sure I did plenty of symbolic, literary analysis in high school and college. I don’t use it in that way now, but the one lasting effect is that I’ve learned ways to question what I’m reading and separate out my response to it—to be keenly aware of my own voice as a reader in the process of that creation. That lets me to know myself better through reading as much as it allows me to edit.

That said, writing (to publish/share) is also a process with purpose and part of the act of translation is building that bridge so the reader can jump the divide between experiences. A writer’s job (though symbolism or whatever) is building that bridge. I have spent years in critiques trying to explain to people that they cannot stand over a reader’s shoulder and tell them what to think as they read. If you are disappointed in the way people receive and translate your work, then you have to think—as with any form of two-way communication—about better ways to bridge the gap between yourself and the rest of the world; make peace with the truth that it’s never going to be a controlled, one-sided relationship.

    • #reading
    • #publishing
    • #books
    • #literature
  • 1 year ago
  • 959
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Famous Novelists on Symbolism in Their Work and Whether It Was Intentional

justmargaret:

mentalflossr:

It was 1963, and 16-year-old Bruce McAllister was sick of symbol-hunting in English class. Rather than quarrel with his teacher, he went straight to the source: McAllister mailed a crude, four-question survey to 150 novelists, asking if they intentionally planted symbolism in their work. Seventy-five authors responded. Here’s what they had to say.

IT DOESN’T MATTER IF THE AUTHOR PUT IT THERE INTENTIONALLY OR NOT. That is not the point. Reading is not a game of Clue; books are not a mystery that you have to solve by putting all the pieces together. That’s not the point. Find the meaning you want to find in it. That’s what we do with books because that’s what we do in life.

What Margaret said. If the point of reading is merely to understand precisely what the author intended, then reading is just this miserable one-sided conversation in which an author is droning on to you page after page after page and the reader just sits there receiving a monologue.

That’s not reading. That’s listening.

Reading is the active co-creation of a story, complete with all its symbols and abstractions. 

To read well, you have to understand that sometimes an oligarchic pig is not just an oligarchic pig. Maybe Orwell intended Animal Farm to be about how dangerous pigs can be. Maybe he had a personal vendetta against pigs. It doesn’t matter. Animal Farm happens to say a lot about how humans organize themselves, and how power and social status shape our understanding of justice. It happens to capture the limits of human empathy, and how those limitations can lead to structural inequality.

I don’t see how it matters at all whether Orwell intended his book to be as good as it turned out to be. So when the story above says that a 16-year-old went “straight to the source,” the article is dead wrong, because every story has two sources: writer and reader.

Source: mentalflossr

    • #reading
    • #literature
    • #books
    • #critical reading
    • #metaphor
    • #symbolism
  • 1 year ago > mentalflossr
  • 4936
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
Page 1 of 2
← Newer • Older →

Portrait/Logo

About

This is the tumblr of John Green, the #1 New York Times bestselling author of The Fault in Our Stars, Looking for Alaska, An Abundance of Katherines, Paper Towns, and half of Will Grayson, Will Grayson. I am also the co-creator of the vlogbrothers youtube channel.

I am best known on tumblr for a drizzle/hurricane metaphor.

You can ask me questions only if you agree not to get mad if I don't answer.

FAQ:
1. Why is your tumblr name fishingboatproceeds?
2. What does DFTBA stand for?
3. Do you and Hank consider yourself nerdfighters?
4. So, does the actual John Green run this tumblr, or is it run by an assistant?
5. Would you release a book that isn't YA?
6. Would you ever write a YA book with an adult in a key role?
7. How do I become a nerdfighter?
8. What's the story behind Pizza John?
9. How do you pronounce bufriedo?
10. How do you feel about the TFiOS movie rights being optioned?
11. Do you get a thrill from killing your characters?
12. "You can love someone so much...But you can never love people as much as you can miss them." 
Can you talk about this?
13. What's this drizzle/hurricane metaphor that you're best known for on tumblr?

Recently used tags:

Following

  • celeryandhummus
  • robofillet
  • sharkeyejones
  • tyleroakley
  • wasarahbi
  • eddplant
  • fuckyeahcartography
  • isnerdy
  • hopeonatenspeed
  • liamdryden
  • kenyatta
  • itsvondell
  • typesetjez
  • zaielle
  • hermionejg
  • edwardspoonhands
  • meghantonjes
  • effyeahthoughtsfromplaces
  • molly23
  • phampants
  • karenkavett
  • paigelfinch
  • roxinpunch
  • frezned
  • mememolly
  • mydrunkkitchen
  • wilwheaton
  • italktosnakes
  • valerie2776
  • hollyblack
  • museumuesum
  • colchrishadfield
  • bryarly
  • thefrogman
  • sarazarr
  • generic-nerdfighter-blog
  • abandonedography
  • life
  • joshboonemovies
  • rachelfershleiser
  • theatlanticcities
  • soundpicture
  • danicashmanica
  • defranco
  • ilovecharts
  • thecrashcourse
  • contemporaryartdaily
  • elysemarshall
  • fuckyeahfitzgerald
  • theadventuresofpizzajohn
  • penguinteen
  • neil-gaiman
  • justmargaret
  • richardmccoy
  • kittydothedishes
  • effyeahnerdfighters
  • tswgo
  • joshsundquist
  • cassandraclare
  • authorsarahdessen
  • dftbarecords
  • awesomepeoplereading
  • hodgman
  • nypl
  • elliottholt
  • alandistro
  • maureenjohnsonbooks
  • kimyadawson
  • david
  • neilcicierega
  • jonnyeveson
  • usart
  • rionhunter
  • buckhollywood
  • elockhartbooks
  • realhayleyghoover
  • johndarnielle
  • stowngazette
  • thejoeball
  • pmautomat
  • plannedparenthood
  • offonatangent
  • elmify
  • theallycarter
  • looktouch
  • schmoyoho
  • lifescouts
  • lexcanroar
  • emilybooks
  • art-history
  • rocketrictic
  • thisbelongsinamuseum
  • effyeahhenrygreen
  • lifeatka
  • royhobbson
  • jsgabel
  • namlhots
  • johngreenbookcovers
  • dictionaryofobscuresorrows
  • other-wordly
  • zusakbooks
  • pizzajohn
  • donjudd
  • pooperchantproject
  • lindsayrobertson
  • tatumsbagsoffun
  • cgpgrey
  • anselelgort
  • myidealcities
  • whatevs
  • heidijulavits
  • absolumentmoderne
  • dtmax
  • poweredbyawesome
  • stalledsatellites
  • watchingvlogbrothers
  • kurtmcrobert
  • pooryorickentertainment
  • footballandnietzche
  • vidthoughts
  • pauladeenridingthings
  • projectforawesome
  • onlyifyoufinishedalaska
  • onlyifyoufinishedkatherines
  • onlyifyoufinishedtfios
  • infiniteboston
  • rjpalacio
  • prettyandgood
  • onlyifyoufinishedwgwg
  • peopleraindrizzlehurricane
  • onlyifyoufinishedpapertowns
  • ibarelyuse
  • historicalmeetups
  • metatfios
  • fuckkyeahindiana
  • nerdfighteria-island
  • contemporist1
  • effyeahpizzajohn
  • sonsofadmirals
  • michaelchabon
  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • You can ask me questions only if you agree not to get mad if I don't answer.
  • Mobile
Effector Theme by Pixel Union